Visit msnbc.com for Breaking News, World News, and News about the Economy
See Also:
Biased Documentaries by the Media
2008: Worst UFO Media Year Ever!
SHARE YOUR UFO EXPERIENCE
HELP SUPPORT THIS SITE
ABOUT DONATIONS
.png)
Tuesday, September 08, 2009
Secrets of The Future Today: Watching The Skies for UFOs
See Also:
Biased Documentaries by the Media
2008: Worst UFO Media Year Ever!
SHARE YOUR UFO EXPERIENCE
HELP SUPPORT THIS SITE
ABOUT DONATIONS
2 comments :
Dear Contributor,
Your comments are greatly appreciated, and coveted; however, blatant mis-use of this site's bandwidth will not be tolerated (e.g., SPAM etc).
Additionally, healthy debate is invited; however, ad hominem and or vitriolic attacks will not be published, nor will "anonymous" criticisms. Please keep your arguments "to the issues" and present them with civility and proper decorum. -FW
Subscribe to:
Post Comments
(
Atom
)
LIVE SIGHTING REPORTS BY MUFON
Theres that phrase again...
ReplyDelete"So..are you a believer?"
It'always packaged the same way, which is why I'm one who refers to it all as professional Psyops. They've had years to hone it -to be presented the way that it is. Thats just my opinion.
Mornin' Bob,
ReplyDeleteThis morning's Today Show piece shown above is what we've come to expect from the MSM! This flapdoodle is and has been the status quo for decades!
Not obvious to the layperson, or perhaps the younger viewers (as you noted) is the injection of the description, "true believers!" (In the very first sentence no less). Immediately, painting the subject matter as a "faith-based topic!" (ad nauseam!) To add to the "misrepresentation," they combine the "audio" with visual aids from "science fiction movies," further adding a "mythos" element to the phenomenon.
Then adding insult to injury the meld important, slient minutiae i.e., the Nick Poe segment, the Edgar Mitchell piece along with the expose of the MoD's previously secret UFO documents, one concerning the "shoot down orders" during a UFO encounter!
This conflation only confuses the layperson to the subject matter, and is misleading at the least, and "disinformation" in the worst case scenario!
Stand by for an editorial . . .
Cheers,
Frank