Fake YouTube videos showing lights over Dome of the Rock spark Internet debate ranging from theology, eschatology, one user’s genealogy.
The lack of higher intelligence seems more acute than ever, with at least three fabricated YouTube videos recently posted showing the same spot of light floating above the Temple Mount in Jerusalem with the unconvincing oohs and aahs of those witnessing and filming the “UFO” in the background. The videos have garnered over 2 million views by Sunday. . . .
HOAXkiller1 is leading the pack of debunking videos, with some 350,000 views on Sunday evening for six separate pieces, showing the original photo available on Wikipedia Commons that was the backdrop for the rather primitive work done in an attempt to make it look like part of a video shoot.
Besides close-ups that showed the background image was actually a static image on a screen and pointing out the faults in the attempt to show flashes of light, an effect called “motion tile” was also used in eligael’s video to enable the deception of an authentic video camera shot.
Motion tile mirrors a bit of the edges of a static image “to hide the black edges created when they added fake camera shake to the video,” HOAXkiller 1 explains. “The camera movements are fake. That is why the mirror lines follow the movement of the camera.”
Pages
- Front Page
- AARO
- AATIP
- Aliens
- Abductions
- CIA
- Chronicles
- Congress
- Crashes
- Documentaries
- DoD
- Flying Discs
- Flying Saucers
- Hoaxes
- IFOs
- Interviews
- MUFON
- My UFO Experience
- NASA
- Nimitz UFO Incident
- Orbs
- Pentagon UFO Program
- Photos
- Project Blue Book
- Project Grudge
- Radio
- Reports
- Roswell
- UAP
- Reader Reports
- UFOs
- UFOs & Nukes
- Videos
Subscribe to:
Post Comments
(
Atom
)
No comments :
Post a Comment
Dear Contributor,
Your comments are greatly appreciated, and coveted; however, blatant mis-use of this site's bandwidth will not be tolerated (e.g., SPAM etc).
Additionally, healthy debate is invited; however, ad hominem and or vitriolic attacks will not be published, nor will "anonymous" criticisms. Please keep your arguments "to the issues" and present them with civility and proper decorum. -FW