On December 1, 2011 the second Disclosure Petition will be submitted to the White House's We the People initiative. Under the new rules this petition must secure 25,000 signatures within 30 days of its submission (by December 31) in order to receive a formal response from the Obama administration. The first Disclosure Petition received 12,078 signatures. Over the next two weeks PRG will pre-promote Disclosure Petition II to ensure it has the best possible chance to succeed. Also, if on submission it quickly secures thousands of signatures, it will attract immediate media attention.
The response to the first Disclosure Petition was unacceptable and indefensible. Disclosure Petition II is a direct challenge to that response and could generate a substantial media engagement. But it is up to the people to make that happen. Spread the word this petition will go active on the White House website on December 1, 2011.
Response to Disclosure Petition I
The Disclosure Petition II language and info to be submitted are as follows:
________________
"We petition the Obama Administration to demand a full congressional investigation of UFO/ET Disclosure efforts by the Clinton OSTP - the Rockefeller Initiative."
In response to the first Disclosure Petition, the OSTP stated, "The U.S. government has no evidence that any life exists outside our planet, or that an extraterrestrial presence has contacted or engaged any member of the human race."
If true, what was the OSTP investigating from March 1993 to October 1996 in concert with billionaire and Clinton friend, Laurance Rockefeller?
Those who knew of and have not spoken publicly of this initiative include: Bill Clinton, Sec. of State Hillary Clinton, Obama transition co-chair John Podesta, Sec. of Defense Leon Panetta, Dr. John Gibbons, Albert Gore and Governor Bill Richardson.
No comments :
Post a Comment
Dear Contributor,
Your comments are greatly appreciated, and coveted; however, blatant mis-use of this site's bandwidth will not be tolerated (e.g., SPAM etc).
Additionally, healthy debate is invited; however, ad hominem and or vitriolic attacks will not be published, nor will "anonymous" criticisms. Please keep your arguments "to the issues" and present them with civility and proper decorum. -FW