Editor's Note: This video originally surfaced in '07–FW
A video surfaced in the spring of 2007 showing an unedited pre-interview discussion of the Chicago O'Hare Airport UFO sighting between Jon Hilkevitch (the Chicago Tribune transportation reporter who reported the Chicago UFO story) and Jim Wagner a news anchor with CLTV, a 24 Hour news channel in Oak Brook, Illinois.
The video shows both men having an off-air discussion about the amount of international media reaction to the UFO story as well as discussing United Airlines alleged "flip-flop" on the event and the FAA's explanation as "weather phenomenon" that according to Hilkevitch's sources "just doesn't wash." Hilkevitch also mentions that photographs were possibly taken by a pilot with a digital camera and that the story is "the most read story in the history of CT.com (chicagotribune.com)" with almost a "million hits."
Hilkevitch then goes on to say that he is hearing from: "serious researchers at major US universities who've attempted to do their own investigations and, when they go to the government to try to get information, they get stonewalled." Hilkevitch continues by saying "So there really is this universal feeling that the government knows more than it's willing to tell." . . .
Continue Reading . . .
See Also:
The Chicago O’Hare UFO Incident: 7 Years Later, Still No Answers
DISC-SHAPED UFO REPORTED OVER O'HARE AIRPORT
O’Hare UFO Incident Seeps Into Mainstream Media Venues
O'Hare UFO Witness Appears in Silhouette on CNN
O'HARE UFO PHOTO FINALLY SURFACES?
Online O’Hare Airport Exhibit Includes UFO Sighting | VIDEO
In The Sky! A Bird? A Plane? A ... UFO?
For Many at O'hare it was a UFO, For The FAA a 'Hole-Punch Cloud'
O’Hare Airport Sighting, (UFO, Hoax or Security Threat)
Does Dan Aykroyd Have the O'Hare UFO Footage?
SHARE YOUR UFO EXPERIENCE
No comments :
Post a Comment
Dear Contributor,
Your comments are greatly appreciated, and coveted; however, blatant mis-use of this site's bandwidth will not be tolerated (e.g., SPAM etc).
Additionally, healthy debate is invited; however, ad hominem and or vitriolic attacks will not be published, nor will "anonymous" criticisms. Please keep your arguments "to the issues" and present them with civility and proper decorum. -FW