Stop me if you’ve heard this one before. Someone was browsing on Google Earth when they noticed a pink UFO in the sky.
This has become a common occurrence in recent years, and this indicates that either Earth is being invaded by stylish extraterrestrials, or, the more likely explanation, people continue to be fooled by common lens flare.
The latest pink UFO sighting was discovered in Trout Creek, Montana on Google Earth by a guy in Newfoundland who then informed a guy in Taiwan. Are you following this? So here’s where this particular pink UFO sighting gets a little more bizarre than others. The Google Earth image apparently shows a carefree alien with the top down and the wind in his or her hair.
The individual who claims this discovery is, of course, Scott Waring of the sensationalistic website UFOSightingsDaily.com. He posted a video to his YouTube channel to explain how to see this convertible UFO and its driver on Google Earth. He describes in the video’s description:
. . . People all over the world have detected UFOs using Google Earth and the Street View feature of Google Maps practically since the service was launched in 2007. Back in 2012, photo-video analyst Marc D’Antonio told Huffington Post journalist Lee Speigel that he believes these pink UFOs are simply lens flare resulting from the camera’s location in relation to the sun’s position. And that is demonstrated in the following video:
Continue Reading . . .
See Also:
Image of UFO & 'Alien Head' Discovered on Google Earth? | VIDEO
UFO or Lens Flare in Google Street View? You Decide | VIDEO
Did Google Street View Capture A UFO Over St. Charles County? | UFO NEWS | VIDEO
Flying Saucer (UFO) Image Captured By 'Google Earth?'
UFO NEWS | VIDEO | Did Google Earth Capture Images of The So-called Chinese Area 51?
SHARE YOUR UFO EXPERIENCE
No comments :
Post a Comment
Dear Contributor,
Your comments are greatly appreciated, and coveted; however, blatant mis-use of this site's bandwidth will not be tolerated (e.g., SPAM etc).
Additionally, healthy debate is invited; however, ad hominem and or vitriolic attacks will not be published, nor will "anonymous" criticisms. Please keep your arguments "to the issues" and present them with civility and proper decorum. -FW