Witnesss were told that the mystery object was “no meteorite, but a guided object, probably from the military establishment of a foreign power.” (click and or right click on image to enlarge) |
Editors Note—The article above generally concerns what was initially reported to be a meteorite, which was tracked across the sky on October 30, 1947 (not August 1948 as the article incorrectly cites). | The Rockdale Reporter and Messenger 1-2-1950 |
The Weafers reported their strange experience to persons, who had been in civilization, and were told that it was the much talked of meteorite. Soon university scientists arrived and set up measuring and calculating devices at the point where Mrs. Weafer first saw the strange object.The Aztec Incident was/is thought to have occurred in the Spring (March) of 1948; what was publicly labeled a meteorite referenced in the a fore mentioned article occurred on October, 30 1947, approximately 5 months earlier. Were the Weafer’s witnesses to the Aztec Incident (from afar), further confirming military and scientific involvement? Was their experience a separate incident, 5 months apart, involving the military and scientists? Or was their sighting of an actual meteorite which seems to conflict with the Weafer declarations?—FW
"Internationally known experts," says Weafer, "who were present that day at our home, approached me and told me that it was no meteorite, but a guided object, probably from the military establishment of a foreign power. There seemed considerable agreement among scientists and military authorities on the point." [Editor's emphasis]
See Also:
1948 Aztec New Mexico Incident
Aztec UFO Crash of 1948
- The England Connection -
"Flying Saucer" Recovery At Hart Canyon (Part Three)---- The Witnesses
REPORT YOUR UFO EXPERIENCE
No comments :
Post a Comment
Dear Contributor,
Your comments are greatly appreciated, and coveted; however, blatant mis-use of this site's bandwidth will not be tolerated (e.g., SPAM etc).
Additionally, healthy debate is invited; however, ad hominem and or vitriolic attacks will not be published, nor will "anonymous" criticisms. Please keep your arguments "to the issues" and present them with civility and proper decorum. -FW